Understanding Implied Authority in Contracts
Implied authority is a crucial concept in contract law, defining the agent’s power to carry out tasks necessary for an organization’s objectives. Contrary to express authority explicitly outlined in a contract, implied authority allows an agent to enter into legally binding agreements on behalf of another entity.
—
Functionality of Implied Authority
Implied authority is the implicit consent for an agent to act on behalf of a principal, supplementing express authority. Not every detail of an agent’s abilities can be specified in a contract. For instance, in real estate, express authority grants an agent the right to act on a principal’s behalf.
Key Insights:
- Three key authority types—express, implied, and apparent—are pivotal in business transactions like real estate dealings.
- Apparent authority arises when an individual’s actions suggest their authorization to act in the principal’s interest.
- In real estate, signing a binder with a client bestows implied authority on an agent to represent the seller.
- Express authority is evident when an agent operates under their company’s mandate to act on behalf of a principal, such as in the case of a life insurance agent.
This authority extends to insurance agents authorized to solicit life insurance applications and arrange sales appointments, demonstrating implied authority. Similarly, uniforms or nametags bearing a business logo infer implied authority in certain scenarios.
—
Illustration of Implied Authority
Consider a restaurant scenario where a server offers a free beverage with an entree purchase, implying a contractual agreement on behalf of the business. Despite subsequent involvement by other employees, the server’s initial engagement represents the business for the transaction.
Should a restaurant manager retract such an offer, they would breach the legally binding contract, highlighting the significance of honoring implied authority agreements. This principle applies across various legal contexts, emphasizing compliance with implicit responsibilities.
—
Key Considerations
Distinct from implied authority, “expressed authority” results from clear permission granted by the principal to the agent, either verbally or in writing. On the other hand, “apparent authority” arises when a principal’s actions inadvertently convey authority to a reasonable third party, bridging gaps in explicit or implied mandates.